Name..... FIDE rating ....... World Rank
Interview with Mark Dvoretsky
A three-part interview with world famous chess trainer and author Mark Dvoretsky, who died in September. Although Dvoretsky's higest FIDE title was IM, his chess books made him more famous and influential than most GMs.
Indian IM Sagar Shah visited Dvoretsky at his Moscow home in March, and the interveiw appeared on the ChessBase website in October and November. In it, Dvoretsky discusses his training sessions with Anand and Topalov, his students Yusupov and Dreev, working with computers (including a remark that ChessBase has eliminated one of his favourite features from CB7), and his preference for not working on openings. A few quotes:
His own books:
"I think it's very difficult to say which one is my favourite, but I can surely point out that there is no book which I am ashamed of. I have never seen any bad reviews about my books anywhere. This is because I never wrote a book just for the sake of writing."
Favourite chess authors:
John Nunn, Jonathan Rowson, Grigory Sanakoev (World Correspondence champion), and Andy Soltis -- the ones Andy writes for pleasure, not the ones he writes for money.
Accumulating information vs training skills:
"I feel that many chess trainers think that chess is a game based on information. They try to collect data from various sources, learn them and then teach it to their students. But we mustn't forget chess is also a sport and to be successful at a sport it is not enough to just have knowledge, you should have skills too. And for the development of skills you need to train."
Mark Taimanov
Russian Grandmaster Mark Taimanov died November 28, at the age of 90.
He was one of the strongest players in the 1950s through 1970s: playing in 23 Championships of the USSR, tying for first twice. He contributed important opening ideas for Black which now bear the name "Taimanov variation" in both the Sicilian (2....e6 and 4...Nc6) and the Nimzo-Indian (4.e3 Nc6). He is unfortunately best known for losing a Candidate's match to Bobby Fischer 6-0 in Vancouver in 1971.
Unlike almost all modern grandmasters, Taimanov had successful careers outside of chess: as a youngster he appeared in films, and as an adult he had a successful career as a concert pianist specializing in piano duos. You can find links to videos from his film and piano careers below.
"Kontsert Bethovena"
A short clip from the 1937 film. Taimanov is the curly haired boy with the violin:
Piano Duet (1963)
"Brazilieira" from the suite "Scaramouche" by Darius Milhaud
Dvoretsky analyzes Taimanov
Finally, an excerpt from Dvoretsky's masterpiece Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual, where he annotates a very complex endgame played by Mark Taimanov.
This excerpt is from the first edition of DEM, and it is by no means Dvoretsky's last word on this ending: in 2016 he recorded a series of endgame videos with Jan Gustafsson for chess24.com and there he returned to this ending to add even more discoveries:
..
[Event "Moscow ch-USSR"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "1955.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Ilivitsky, Georgy"]
[Black "Taimanov, Mark"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Annotator "Mark Dvoretsky"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "8/p6p/5pk1/6p1/6P1/r4PKP/P1R5/8 w - - 0 36"]
[PlyCount "19"]
[EventDate "1955.??.??"]
[SourceTitle "DEM"]
[Source "ChessCafe/CB"]
[SourceDate "2003.10.29"]
{Material is balanced, but Black stands better because his rook is more active.
At this moment, both sides would like to improve the structure on the kingside
by means of an h-pawn advance, but Black is ready to do it while White is not
(because he then loses his f-pawn).} 36. Rh2 $2 ({With the pawn sacrifice} 36.
Rc6 $1 Rxa2 (36... h5 37. gxh5+ Kxh5 38. Rxf6) 37. h4 gxh4+ 38. Kxh4 $11 {
White could solve two problems at once: he activates his rook and improves the
kingside situation. Then the draw is an easy matter.}) 36... h5 $1 37. Rc2 (37.
h4 {could have been a logical continuation but, as G. Levenfish demonstrated,
Black maintains a considerable advantage after} hxg4 38. Kxg4 (38. hxg5 f5 39.
Rf2 Kxg5 $19) 38... f5+ $1 (38... Ra4+ $2 39. Kg3 gxh4+ 40. Rxh4 Rxa2 $11 {
leads to a drawn position.}) 39. Kg3 g4 40. Rf2 Kh5 41. Rf1 (41. Kf4 Ra4+ 42.
Kxf5 g3 $19) 41... Ra4 $1 {/\ f4+} 42. fxg4+ Rxg4+ 43. Kf3 Kxh4 $1 {/\ Kg5, Ra4
} (43... Rxh4 {is less accurate: White plays} 44. Rg1 {and the pawn endgame
after} Rg4 $2 {is drawn.} (44... a5 {/\ Rg4} 45. Rg8 Ra4 (45... Rg4 $2 46. Rh8+
Kg5 47. Rg8+ $11) 46. a3 Rc4 47. Ra8 a4 48. Rg8 Rd4 $22 $17 {Dvoretsky}) 45.
Rxg4 fxg4+ 46. Kg3 a5 47. a4 $1 $11) 44. Rc1 Kg5 45. a3 Ra4 46. Rc3 Kf6 47. Rb3
a5 $17 {Do you remember that we have seen a very similar position in Miles –
Webb?}) (37. gxh5+ Kxh5 {(with the idea f6-f5-f4+)} 38. h4 {then} g4) 37... h4+
{This pawn is very strong: it presses on the white king and fixes the weakness
at h3. White's defensive mission is quite hard. In the remainder of the game,
however, Taimanov was not precise enough, but his opponent missed his chance
to save the game.} 38. Kf2 a6 $6 {(an inconceivable move)} 39. Rb2 Rc3 $2 {
The rook should have stayed on a3 until Black moved the a-pawn well ahead and
instead improved his king's position. White would probably still expect a draw
after placing his rook on e2 in order to prevent the black king's appearance
in the center.} (39... Kf7 $142) 40. Kg2 a5 $2 ({Correct was} 40... Ra3 {
followed by Kf7.}) 41. Rf2 $2 {The same passive policy (by the way, the game
was annotated by many yet no one revealed the errors that were committed by
the opponents at this stage).} ({Again, White should have taken the
opportunity to activate his rook:} 41. Rb7 $1 Rc2+ 42. Kg1 Rxa2 43. Ra7 $11 {
Grandmaster N. Krogius evaluates the resulting position as lost for White
"because of the bad position of White's pawns, and especially that of his king
– cut off on the first rank." But what about Black's king? He will stay
offside forever, because f6-f5 can be always met with Ra6+ followed by gf.
White's rook stays on a7, the king calmly waits on g1-h1; Black pushes his
pawn ahead, it comes to a3, what then?}) 41... Ra3 $6 (41... Rc4 $1 {was more
accurate because White could play 7 f4!? gf 8 Rxf4 now, this pawn sacrifice
deserved earnest attention.}) 42. Kf1 (42. f4 $5 gxf4 43. Rxf4 Rxa2+ 44. Kf3
Rb2 $1 {=/-+ ?} (44... Rh2 $2 45. Ra4 Rxh3+ 46. Kf4 $11)) 42... Kf7 $2 ({
Black probably rejected} 42... f5 {because of} 43. f4 $1) ({A good idea could
be} 42... Ra4 $5 {preventing the opponent's activity on the kingside, although
White could then cut off the black king by means of} 43. Kg2 Kf7 44. Re2) 43.
f4 $1 gxf4 44. Rxf4 {(/\ 10 g5)} Kg6 45. Rf2 $2 {White made this passive move
and resigned, realizing that his position is absolutely hopeless after 10...
Rxh3.} ({Meanwhile he could probably hold after} 45. Rf5 $1 Rxa2 {because he
can employ the Vancura idea} 46. Kg1 $1 ({He has no time for capturing the
h-pawn:} 46. Rh5 $2 a4 47. Rxh4 (47. Ra5 Kf7 $1 48. Ra6 a3 $19 {is also
hopeless.}) 47... a3 48. Rh8 Rb2 $19) 46... a4 47. Rf4 $1 {Even if Black's
king manages to leave the kingside by means of zugzwang:} Ra3 48. Kh2 (48. Kf2
$1 Kg7 49. Kf1 $1 $11 {is even simpler.}) 48... Kg7 $22 (48... Kf7 49. g5) 49.
Rb4 (49. Kg2 Rg3+ {and 15...a3.}) 49... Kf7 50. Re4 Kf8 $22 51. Rf4 Ke7 {
no more progress can be achieved: the king has no refuge from checks from the
side near the passed pawn, therefore the rook cannot abandon the a-file.} 52.
Rb4 Kd6 53. Rf4 Kc5 54. Rf5+ Kd4 55. Rf4+ Ke5 56. Rb4 $11) (45. Rf2 Rxh3 $19)
0-1
..